For instance, recently I read how
- Those who love the Savior keep the Torah. (Jn 14:15,21)
- YHVH’s Torah is pure. (Ps 19:8)
- YHVH’s Torah is spiritual. (Rom 7:14)
- YHVH’s Torah is holy. (Rom 7:12)
- YHVH’s Torah is just. (Rom 7:12)
- YHVH’s Torah is perfect. (Ps 19:7 and Rom 12:2)
- YHVH’s Torah is immutable. (Dt 4:2)
Well, you get the picture. By the time I go through all those wonderful verses I can't help but get excited.
So I put together a letter, or I get on a Christian forum to share this great joy with those I feel will be as blessed as I am.
But something strange happens.
The response I get comes back all wrong. It's like the Twilight Zone where I opened somebody else's mail and none of the words make any sense.
"You're trying to take us back into bondage under the Law."
"Paul had tough words to say about your kind trying to rob us of our freedom."
"You're a legalist and a Judaizer."
So here I sit trying to make sense of all this.
These are Gentiles I wrote to. None of them were Jewish, Which means that even if I agreed that the "Law" was a bondage, none of them even had a clue about Biblical Laws or obeying the Scripture before they got saved.
I mean, picture this...the town druggie spending his day bemoaning the fact that some "Judaizer" was keeping him in bondage to G-d's Law. C'mon.
What's more, it's especially confusing to me when that same Scripture tells me YHVH’s Torah is freedom, and a delight, not bondage. (Ps 119:44-45,47)
Well, something is wrong. The righteous should mourn when the Torah is not kept. (Ps 119:136), but what I experience is just the opposite. The "orthodox" Christian community seems to come out in attack mode when the Torah is kept.
Not to be one who can't admit when he's wrong, I decided to get to the bottom of all this and look up "Legalism" and "Judaizer" in my Strong's Bible Concordance and New Ungers Bible Dictionary. I thought maybe that would give me a few clues to where I've gone wrong.
Whoa, I didn't know what other big surprise lay in store.
I can't find any form of the words "Legalism" or "Judaizer" in any source. And yet, I know it must be there since I've heard these terms bantered around for years.
Anyway, I've come to the conclusion my Bible translation must be defective or missing a few pages. I'm pretty sure I've narrowed down the reason. It's because I don't have one of the original infallible King Jimmy versions.
Yea, that must be it.
And doggone it, I had one a long time ago. My grandmother gave it to me when I was about nine years old. It sure was nice looking, all covered with a big mosaic picture of Jesus. Too bad I don't know where it went.
Because my GrandMa gave me that Bible, I tried for years to read it, but places like the part about suffering the little children left me bewildered. Guess that's why the first time I read a Good News for Modern Man I ended up getting saved.
You know, come to think of it, I didn't realize at the time that it was the Law I was being saved from - like those people who write me say. Somehow I thought Jesus died so I could be forgiven my sins and start living a righteous life.
Hmmm, but to live a righteous life I can't disobey G-d, so...I have to do what He says. But if I do what He says then I'm a Judaizer. And Judaizers are bad. Why, judging from what I've heard, alcoholics, prostitutes, and thieves are more welcome in church than a Judaizer.
Oh well, I should contact one of those King Jimmy only people to get this figured out. I bet they're experts on Legalism and Judaizers.