Warning on the dilemma of a false prophet

Many years ago the famous theologian Snoopy in a Charlie Brown cartoon strip made a powerful statement that should start us all to thinking. Snoopy was sitting on his dog house typing away at his ancient typewriter. Charlie Brown comes up and asks what he's doing. Snoopy said he was writing a book on theology. It was entitled, "Have You Ever Considered You Might Be Wrong?"

Don't you find that an intriguing question?

I do. Yet in my experience everyone gives the same predictable answer.

"No. I'm not wrong. Those others are."

What is your reaction? Is it any different?

This brings me to the point of this letter:

Do false prophets know they are false prophets?

Think about it. Consider the most outrageous TV evangelist/self-proclaimed prophet...do they think they are wrong? Of course not. I speak not about those deliberate shysters only concerned about money, but the rest who actually think they are speaking the "Word of the Lord."

Consider for a moment the Mormons and the Jehovah's Witnesses. Openly declared as false prophets by literally everyone else, they don't consider themselves to be in error. Even with all the many missed prophecies concerning the Messiah's return, the JW's still consider themselves to be orthodox.(Don't get sidetracked here and think I'm presenting a case for the Mormons and JW's. I use them just for illustration.)

However, Yahshua (Jesus) made it plain that many in the last days will think they are doing wonderful things for Him, but in fact, He doesn't know them as His own. The people He describes are not Muslims, Buddhists, or New Agers. He describes these people as having done many wonders and prophesied in His Name. That makes them among the Christian fold. (Matt: 7:21-23)

I find that pretty sobering if not scary. There are a lot of apparently dynamic fellow believers who aren't on the pathway to heaven. Yahshua will reject them. They could be pastors, worship leaders, Sunday school teachers and more.

The ancient Israelites who witnessed the greatest outpouring of YHWH's (G-D) power in bringing them out of bondage in Egypt didn't last very long before they went astray. Time and time again we read how they disobeyed the Scripture and listened to false prophets.

Somehow we can read those accounts and still remain aloof as though it can't happen to us. I hear some who say that YHWH has preserved His church and it has progressed continually growing from glory to glory. Yet as I look around I see a continuous pattern of falling away from the faith...growing more and more apostate each time.

Notice in Matthew 24:11 how Yahshua warns us of false prophets who will rise up and deceive many.

Let me re-emphasize how tough this is and how diligent we must be.

Yahshua warns us there will be false prophets

• who perform miraculous works (they look like they have the power of YHWH)
• who speak prophecy in His Name (they talk like they have the Words of YHWH)
• who deceive many (they have the power to get large multitudes to believe them - perhaps even having mega church empires)
• who are deceived themselves

Are you listening to false prophets? Would you know it if you were? Are we unknowingly acting as false prophets?

We need to be extra careful that what we believe and teach is really Scriptural.

It reminds me of the movie about Apollo 13. After all the problems caused by the explosion in the spacecraft, they were critically low on resources. They had one chance to slingshot around the moon and re-enter earth's atmosphere at precisely the right angle. Too steep and they would burn up. Too shallow and they would shoot off into space. There was a very narrow pathway back to the safety of earth. The calculations had to perfect. There would be no second chance.

Likewise for us the pathway is straight and narrow. Our calculations have to be correct. There is no second chance.

Why Ya'akov and not Romans?

I could've titled this topic as Someone Scrambled the Scriptures!

Most copies of the New Testament today follow this order:
Gospels
Acts
Pauline Epistles
Jewish Epistles
Revelation

However the original manuscript order of the books was:
Gospels
Acts
Jewish Epistles
Pauline Epistles
Revelation

This was testified to by the ancient fathers in the faith.

Athanasius (296-373 CE) Bishop of Alexandria gives the order of books as “the four Gospels; the Acts of the Apostles; the seven Catholic (universal) Epistles; the fourteen epistles of St. Paul; and the Revelation of John”. Leonitus of Byzantium gives this order as well.

Philastrius, a fourth century Church Father also argued that the Catholic (Universal) Epistles must precede the Pauline epistles because Gal. 1:17 has Paul referring to the Emissaries of the Jewish Epistles as coming before him.

Cyril, Bishop of Jerusalem also maintained the original manuscript order as did the Council of Laodicea.

But, in the Latin Vulgate we see this order rearranged by Rome. The Pauline epistles dominate first place with the Jewish epistles following.

Why would they do that? What was wrong with the original that the church felt that had to change it? I don't know about you but I get suspicious when I discover that men have tinkered with things like this.

You may ask, "does it matter?"

Yes, the original manuscript order was significant. It was the natural outgrowth that the message was to go to the Jews first. Then it was to go to the Gentiles. It also aligns with the concepts that Ya'akov, Kefa (Peter), and Yochanan (John) were emissaries that came before Paul (Gal. 1:17), and who served as three pillars of authority upon which Paul's message was built (Gal. 2:9) - not the other way around.

The reader of the Brit Hadassah was intended to read the "Jewish" epistles first, then read the Pauline epistles - after understanding the Jewish epistles. This way the new believer would've read Ya'akov's admonition concerning faith and works. They would also be warned through Kefa (Peter) about Shaul's (Paul) teaching being hard to understand and often twisted (2Kefa 3:15-16). This would ground them in Scripture before ever attempting to understand the writings of Paul.

At the least this rearranging of the order of the Scriptures (actually it occurs in the Tanack as well) de-emphasizes the Jewish epistles. As a result Shaul's epistles are given an almost superior position of importance. Certainly it begs the question why the Roman church directly influenced this change.

Unfortunately, Shaul's teachings today seem to take center stage in theological disputes. It matters not your position on an issue whether it's predestination or free will, both sides tend to rely heavily on Shaul to prove their case.

Martin Luther almost eliminated the book of Ya'akov entirely. He claimed it was a 'book of straw.' Of course he also labeled the Jews as 'Christ killers' and wrote sermons against them. Hitler borrowed heavily from his thoughts. All of this makes Luther a prime example of how misunderstanding the Jewish nature of the Scripture can have disastrous effects.

Let's hope that by looking at Ya'akov ourselves we can regain a balance upon which to build a reliable understanding of Scripture.

Discerning True Faith - the Wisdom of James

We are 2000 years removed from the faith as delivered to the apostles. The instructions in our possession came from a Jewish culture, written by Jews, concerning a Jewish Messiah. Yet most who read this can not imagine any thing other than a modern gentile Hellenistic mindset. In fact a large number don't really know what a Hellenistic or a Hebraic mindset is. The best way I can think to help gentiles to begin to grasp the difference is to attend a local Jewish synagogue. That will at least open your eyes a bit.

Suffice it to say that the abandonment of our Hebraic roots is responsible for much of the decay in the congregations today through translations and interpretations that are for the most part anti-Semitic. Even some translators who are not anti-Semitic still reflect the overwhelming consensus of their Christian church upbringing.

Much of what we hear as Gospel has been filtered over the centuries through the mesh of antisemitism. It is an anemic version of the original flavor and energy of the message. You can compare it to the difference between buying orange juice with all the pulp or the variety with all the pulp removed. One is full of vigor and strength reflecting the original orange, while the other is similar to colored sugar water.

Some will immediately object - as I once did out of ignorance - that there is any antisemitism in our translations of Scripture. I'll make only two points on that for now.

One is that there is no Scriptural basis for imparting infallibility or inerrancy to those who have translated our modern versions for the last 500 years. It is wishful thinking or human reasoning alone that has brought many to that belief. We are all biased to some degree and the translators were no exception. Often they made decisions of translation based on their personal theological understanding of what the particular verse should say. Some of the sources I use candidly admit doing this by interjecting their understanding of Hebraic/Jewish roots to add the pulp back to the colored sugar water.

Secondly, a prime example is in the title the Book of James. A quick look in Strong's concordance will reveal that the author of this epistle is not named James. His name is the same as that used elsewhere in the Old Testament (Tanack) as Jacob in English. Considering that names can't be translated - only transliterated to sound similar - the name should have at least had a "Y" beginning. That's because there is no "J" sound in the Hebrew. More correctly the name should be transliterated as Ya'akov.

Why the change of the name? Why the inconsistency? The answer is not clear, but the result is the same. We are given an anglicized version that removes any Jewish flavor of the name. The same double standard can be seen in the name of Mary, the mother of Yahshua (Jesus). In the Old Testament (Tanack) the same name is Miriam.

In any case, this is not really a commentary,or a devotion, or a new translation, but a discussion. The sources used here include four Messianic Jewish, or Hebraic roots versions of Scripture along with the New King James version. That will explain why you may see alternate words in parenthesis in the verses to reflect any diverging translations.

In this discussion it is my purpose to exhort, encourage, and enlighten others. I am especially aiming at new believers or teen agers trying to get a practical grip on how to live out their new-found faith and to taste the message with the "Jewish pulp" included.

From this point forward I will use certain conventions in labeling or naming.

Complete Jewish Bible (CJB)
Hebraic Roots Version NT (HRV)
The Scriptures (TS)
Restoration Scriptures True Name Edition Study Bible (RSTNE)
New King James (NKJV)

Old Testament (Tanack)
New Testament (Brit Hadassah)

Jesus (Yahshua)
God (Elohim, Master)
LORD (YHWH, Yahweh)
James (Ya'akov)